This is a lightly-edited version of the of the TMG chat session held 26 Feb 2005 (#1).
cgh | is everyone ready for the 2PM chat |
---|---|
Kevin_Sholder | I believe that I am, just needed to check and make sure this would work. |
cgh | same here never did this before it should be enlightening |
Kevin_Sholder | I hoping we find out when v6.01 will be available. |
cgh | i've been using TMG for some time now but am still cloudy on techniques such as sentences - didn't hear that there was an upgrade so soon |
TerryR | Hello, all. |
darrellm | Hi, all. |
Francie | Hi, I'm Here |
Bob_Velke | hello, everyone |
darrellm | Hail to the Chief. |
John_C | Hi |
[Bob disappeared for a second] | |
darrellm | Scared him off? |
Bob_Velke | oops |
darrellm | I thought it was *me* ... |
Bob_Velke | How's everyone this afternoon? Anyone else digging out from snow? |
darrellm | Snow? I wish. |
Francie | Yes - a foot! |
John_C | We had 5 inches Thursday into Friday. No big deal after the bigger storms we had earlier this winter |
Bob_Velke | Sounds like you need a warm vacation to some tropical islands, John. |
TerryR | Snow? Send some our way - we're fresh out. |
John_C | Bob: Just what the Dr. ordered! |
Bob_Velke | Well, I guess it is time to start. Who's got a question for me? |
darrellm | What's new or exciting? |
Francie | Lots of little bugs being reported - will we have an update soon? |
Bob_Velke | We're preparing v6.01, Francie. I can't promise how long it will be but we're closing in on it. |
Francie | Great news! |
darrellm | I upgraded to a x.0 version against my better judgement, and frankly 6.0 has been much better than most. |
Bob_Velke | As Francie says, there have been lots of little bugs reported and fixed. A few have been high profile but most are of the type that only one or two people have encountered. |
Bob_Velke | The cruise has caused a lot of excitement around here - but now that it is nearly sold out, we'll have to put it out of our heads for nine months or so. |
barbarag | Good afternoon |
Bob_Velke | Hi Barbara. |
barbarag | Hi Bob |
cgh | can an index be created using the Book Manager |
Bob_Velke | An index of reports, cgh? Or an index of people that are in them? |
cgh | an index of reports - like at the beginning of a book |
Bob_Velke | Like a Table of Contents <g>? |
cgh | yes |
Bob_Velke | thinking.... |
barbarag | <g> hope there's not to much smoke |
Bob_Velke | In a word, no. |
cgh | that's what i thought. so it needs to be generated through a word processor? |
Bob_Velke | Yes, that's how I do it, cgh. |
cgh | ok thanks |
DaveZ | Can a list be created of all the exhibits in my project? I have just started using exhibits and I would like to keep track of the ones that I have already entered into the project. |
Bob_Velke | DaveZ, you can SEE all of the exhibits in a project but for a report you may want to look at PathWiz! by Bryan Wetton. There is a free version. |
DaveZ | How are you able to "see" all the exhibits? |
Bob_Velke | In the Exhibit Log, change the focus to "All Exhibits" |
DaveZ | Oh. Now I see them. But I can't print that I presume. |
Bob_Velke | Right, Dave. |
darrellm | Bob: Is there a way to default the Exhibit Log to "All Exhibits" instead of the current focus person? |
Bob_Velke | The Exhibit Log opens to the current focus, whether it is a person, event, citation, place, source, or repository. No, there is no open to change that. |
stans | Hi,Bob - When merging datasets within a project, do the sources, tags and repositories from the data set being from also merge, or do they appear as "duplicates," which one then must merge manually? |
TerryR | stans - sources and repositories appear as duplicates; tag types are "merged", with those from one dataset takeing precidence |
Bob_Velke | stans, the merge process doesn't make any decision about merging people, tags, sourcs, etc. |
Bob_Velke | yes, tag TYPES |
Bob_Velke | Another question? |
bnx | How do I register? |
Bob_Velke | the software? |
Bob_Velke | bnx, if you bought TMG from Wholly Genes, then you don't need to register it. If you bought it from a dealer, you can go to http://www.whollygenes.com/register.htm |
Kevin_Sholder | Can we talk about Place Styles? |
Bob_Velke | Yes, Kevin. |
henry | Is there a way in which the user can remove the period at the end of sentences, e.g. to run sentences from two or more tags together? |
Kevin_Sholder | Darrell, why? |
darrellm | Kevin: Because I can get to the Exhibit Log for a person via the toolbar already. |
Kevin_Sholder | Bob, is there any plans to improve upon how they are handled, so that the same place can have multiple place styles? |
darrellm | Bob: That would be a (minor) wishlist item for me. |
bnx | I'm a member |
Bob_Velke | ok, darrell |
John_C | Kevin: why do you want multiple styles for the same place data? |
Bob_Velke | There's been a lot of talk, Kevin. Can you give me an example of a place that needs multiple styles? |
John_C | Kevin: Answer Bob and that should answer my question, too |
Bob_Velke | bnx, are you talking about registering on the support forum? |
Kevin_Sholder | John, To use different prepositions based on the sentence. |
darrellm | Bob & Kevin & John: Any place that is used in ways that involve different prepositions, for one thing.... |
barbarag | bnx, registering your nickname here at chat? |
John_C | DarrellM: I think a preposition at the tag level would solve that |
CheriM | ? (on Reports - Journal - to File - Fonts) |
Bob_Velke | There's been a lot of discussion about making the preposition an explicit data object on the Tag Entry and/or Master Place List record. I think that it would be a mistake to control it through multiple styles. |
bnx | On this chat session! |
darrellm | John: Possibly, but only if *all* Tags were changed to handle prepositions via the sentence. That has ramifications when some levels are not filled. |
darrellm | Bob: I would certainly *prefer* the preposition to be a Tag level data object. |
barbarag | Right click your name, select member profile |
Bob_Velke | :-\ |
Bob_Velke | Cheri, huh? |
CheriM | iS IT MY turn? |
Kevin_Sholder | Bob, OK, so place style may not be the best way to handle it, but as you indicated "an explicit data" object may be the solution. Can you expand on that thought a little more? |
Bob_Velke | Go ahead, Cheri. I didn't understand your last comment. |
Kevin_Sholder | CheriM, Fonts for reports is another good topic. |
Bob_Velke | John has been an advocate for that. Let's let him explain it <g>. |
CheriM | Bob: I go to Reports, then Journal. Under options, I changed the font from Arial because of the letter "I". I previewed on the screen. It's fine. |
barbarag | Cheri, just type away, Bob can actually carry on two or more conversations at the same time |
Bob_Velke | (plus the one in my head) |
CheriM | Bob: But then when I tell it to print to file, it tells me I have only 4 choices. |
cgh | i think you should turn off the background color |
John_C | Bob: I'd like to see a tag-level preposition field... I need to think about some of the issues before I explain it. After mentioning it a few months ago, I've changed my mind on at least one issue. I'll write something and post it to TMG-L |
CheriM | "not among the font families supported by the word processor converter engine." I have MS Word. The font is there. |
Bob_Velke | When you output to word processor, Cheri, your options on fonts are more limited because it only knows how to translate certain fonts to all of the word processors. If you output to screen or printer, you won't get that question. |
cgh | good job |
darrellm | Bob: On the preposition front, *my* desire is to control prepositions *without* affecting the MPL at all. |
CheriM | Bob: So basically, I should choice one of the 4, then? Arial Courier TimesNewRoman or Symbol? |
Kevin_Sholder | Bob, but why is it limited. What is different about TTF that cause us to be unable to use other font type such as vernada? |
John_C | darrellm: that's my current thinking, too |
Bob_Velke | I think that there would have to be rules of precedence, darrell, like global and local sentences. |
Kevin_Sholder | Darrell, I would agree with that. |
wayneb | darrellm: I agree too |
darrellm | Bob: I agree completely. The rules could be parallel with other rules for local / global sentence "stuff". |
redtabby | sigh, I keep getting kicked out, are the transcripts posted for the chats later? |
John_C | redtabby: I will post a transcript on my site. See TMG-L for the link. It might not be there until tomorrow. |
stans | redtabby - the running commentary says that your Web browser closed. Apparently the problem in with your computer or your server. |
darrellm | Bob: I posted something along these lines a few months back. Summary to follow, point by point (brief). |
darrellm | Bob: Oops -- on TMG-L, not the forum. |
darrellm | Prepositions 1: An MPL place "default" preposition for each "place". Used when no Tag level choice made. |
darrellm | Prepositions 2: A Tag level preposition overriding the MPL default value. |
darrellm | Prepositions 3: Tag level preposition choices would include "no choice" and "no preposition". |
darrellm | Bob:That's *my* opinion, in a nutshell. |
gardener | Bob-What about font selection in RTF reports? Same limits? |
Bob_Velke | I think that RTF output also is limited on fonts supported. |
CheriM | So we are to pick one of the 4 fonts listed above? |
Bob_Velke | Or make a global conversion once the document is opened in the word processor, Cheri. |
bnx | why is it such a hassle just trying to backup a project? It used to be so easy |
Bob_Velke | what's a hassle, bnx? |
bnx | It used to be done in 2 steps. I went from Ultimate Family Tree to TMG & as we "progressed", it became much harder |
Bob_Velke | Choose Backup, click on Next, and then Finish, bnx. What is a hassle? You could also create a custom toolbar button that makes a backup with one click. |
CheriM | Bob: My only problem is "I". As in he was in Company I4. It looks like l4 in Arial. I have only 2 of them. I go into the report and change the font by hand. |
darrellm | Prepositions 4: (I fibbed). A Tag Type preposition default. Overrides the MPL but not a local choice. |
barbarag | The back up can be just a couple clicks from an icon on your toolbar. Instructions in an earlier newsletter. |
barbarag | Let me find which one |
CheriM | Bob: See, my upper case i looks like lower case L's. |
bnx | I'll check into that, thanks |
stans | TerryR - Regarding merging data sets - I assume that you mean that the data set being merged into takes precedence. |
Bob_Velke | a preposition default for the tag TYPE, darrell? That strikes me as odd. |
barbarag | bnx, see http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?showtopic=48 |
wayneb | darrellm: Kevin: How is any one of your options better than just modifying the local sentence to use the preposition we want |
darrellm | Bob: Not the most important, but useful for sentences like "emigrated" and "immigrated". |
darrellm | wayneb: The options I suggest are not an "all or nothing" suggestion. The local Tag control is biggest IMO. |
John_C | wayneb: putting the preposition in the sentence means that the software doesn't know it's a preposition |
John_C | that's important if one kind of output should use a preposition and another shouldn't |
barbarag | bnx, Scroll down to Did you know? |
FranSegall | I often go from one computer to another using backup/restore. Is there any difference between restoring "over" a project and deleting the project before doing the restore? Any advantage one way or the other? |
John_C | If the sentence isn't involved (not a narrative) the preposition is lost |
Bob_Velke | If it is inside conditional brackets in the global sentence, then TMG "knows" that it is a preposition. If the MPL or Tag Type allowed you to specify a preposition, it would have to replace anything that is inside those brackets. |
darrellm | <g> John_C: Losing the preposition outside of a sentence can be a positive for some approaches. (Mine e.g.) |
John_C | Bob: A string of characters inside conditional brackets could be something other than a preposition |
John_C | Plus putting it there means that sentences have to change at the local level for a data difference that shouldn't require that... data shouldn't be in the sentence rules |
Bob_Velke | No, Fran. |
Kevin_Sholder | What about using valiables for prepositions? |
darrellm | Bob: I think for one person to combine preposition "approaches" could get ugly, yes. |
barbarag | Fran, I also go use 2 computers and now keep my data on a USB drive. Before removing the drive, a backup is made onto the hard drive. |
Bob_Velke | Yes, John, but that's the only way TMG has to know how to add a preposition. Otherwise you'll get two. |
John_C | My point is that a preposition in this case is a characteristic of the display of the place data and putting it in the sentence is bad |
John_C | I don't put people's titles in the sentence |
Bob_Velke | "[P] was born <[D]> <near [L]>" would otherwise produce "near in Virginia". |
John_C | Bob: I'm OK with it overriding the text in the conditional, but I don't want that to be the only way to specify preps |
darrellm | Kevin: Are you saying something like Went to school <[PREP]><[L]>. with [PREP] a Tag-level value? I could use that.... |
Kevin_Sholder | Darrell, yes! |
John_C | Ugh |
John_C | Who wants to go rewrite all their sentences? |
darrellm | John_C and Bob: Also, I think care should be taken to avoid "breaking" the current approach. But Bob has been very good about avoiding that kind of thing.... |
Bob_Velke | Whether you specify the preposition on the Tag Entry screen or the MPL, John, it would have to replace the text inside the brackets, right? |
John_C | Bob: Right |
Kevin_Sholder | John, just an idea here, trying to brainstorm a bit. |
FranSegall | OK. Is there any way to backup from computer A and restore to computer B but leaving the preferences on B intact? Especially "paths" on the Advanced part -- the folder structures are different on the 2 computers and I have to keep changing them back. |
darrellm | Bob: In my view, if no preposition as suggested here is defined at any level, then current rules should apply. |
Bob_Velke | I'm guessing that there are some new users whose eyes are rolling up inside their heads right now. If you have a beginner question, please speak up or these experts will drown you out <g>. |
FranSegall | Barb, I've considered that. Do you keep your exhibits, reports and backup folders and all on the USB drive? |
darrellm | Bob: I'm not clear on "the text inside the brackets" in this context. |
Bob_Velke | certainly, darrell. Backward compatible. |
darrellm | <;-)> I'll even stop typing for a bit |
CheriM | I have a question about mulitple wives. Can I go ahead? |
Bob_Velke | conditional brackets, darrell. |
Bob_Velke | PLEASE, Cheri <g>. |
cgh | you're right Bob, i'm a beginner and am completely lost - i realize that they are talking about sentences but haven't gotten that sophisticated yet. i do have a question though. how do you enter a child without a mother - what do you put in the mother slot? |
darrellm | Bob: It's the "text inside" part -- what gets replaced? |
Bob_Velke | put nothing there, cgh, unless you know something about her. |
Bob_Velke | darrell, "<near [L]>". Near gets replaced. |
Bob_Velke | you don't have to record a mother, cgh. |
CheriM | Bob: If Fred marries Wilma and she dies, then he marries Betty and she dies and then he marries Minnie Mouse, I get the sentences (in the Journal Rep) that says he married Wilma. Blah blah blah. He married Betty. Blah blah blah. I'd like it to say he married Betty second, or he married second to Betty. A friend suggested doing alternate roles. |
Kevin_Sholder | unless near is a varialble [NEAR] |
barbarag | Fran, I keep the data on the USB drive, I have exhibits saves on both computer using the same path. The USB drive is also used to put exhibits on that I need to add to the other computer |
cgh | so that when a report is printed like a family group sheet does it just leave the mother section blank? |
darrellm | Bob: I would see this as a problem to be solved by the user. The preposition would be "part of [L]" in the very limited sense of output. Not in the MPL. Kevin's sentence variable is a different idea. |
FranSegall | And John, whichever way this preposition thing is resolved, you need to read our minds re: the zillion ways we've handled prepositions and start coding something to help us clean up our data AGAIN! |
barbarag | Fran, I keep my backups on the hard drive one each computer. So if one hard drive, or the USB drive expires. I have fairly current backups |
cgh | one would think that the compiler forgot to insert a name |
Bob_Velke | If you want to do that without having to change the sentence on the Tag Entry screen, then rolls is a way to do it, Cheri. But what will Pebbles and Bam Bam say about all this?? |
CheriM | CGH: You could just type in "Unknown" for the mother. I do that alot |
stans | All - I'm resigned to having to edit prepositions at the word processor level. My opinion is that there is just so much that an automated process can do. |
Bob_Velke | Kevin, we can't have a variable for every preposition. |
Bob_Velke | rolls=roles. I must be hungry. |
darrellm | Bob: I hope Kevin wasn't suggesting that. I thought he meant a Tag-local value, accessed by [PREP] or the like. |
cgh | so you end up with several "unknown" in the pick list? |
CheriM | Bob: So when I add wife 2 I could change the tag sentence on that screen only (vs. globally?) Am I making sense? |
Bob_Velke | Why, Cheri? |
CheriM | CGH--Yes, I have many "Unknowns" |
cgh | okay then i guess that's okay |
Bob_Velke | Why, Cheri <g>? |
CheriM | Bob: So it says he married second to Betty |
Bob_Velke | You don't need to add a person named "unknown" to do that, Cheri. |
barbarag | CherisM. Read Terry's http://tmg.reigelridge.com/Roles-Marriage.htm -- one way to handle multiple marriages |
darrellm | cgh & CheriM: I don't understand the need to enter anything for an unknown mother. What is the benefit, as against leaving the mother field blank? |
Pegasus891 | What is MPL? |
Master Place List [72 people responded <g>] | |
John_C | FYI: TMG acronyms are explained here: http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?showtopic=333 |
stans | CheriM - My feeling is that this is one reason *not* to use the Picklist. In a large data set, having the picklist linked slows things down too much. I much prefer using Project Explorer, where Reference Field, &c, are displayed. That way, you know which "unknown" it is. |
Kevin_Sholder | Bob, true, as I said before, trying to put as many cards on the table as we can. |
CheriM | Barbara==OK, will print that one out. Thanks. |
CheriM | Darrell: I just don't like the blank field, that's all. And in some of my records it clearly states that the father was unknown (baby out of wedlock). |
Bob_Velke | I'm afraid that I have a family committment and have to leave soon. Maybe others will hang around. Is there another question for me? |
FranSegall | Barb, but if (hypothetically, of course) I didn't want to leave the USB drive attached - at work, for example (hypothetically, of course)- is there any way to keep the Advanced preferences path settings from reverting back every time? It's kinda wierd, some of them change to the way the preferences were on the other computer, but some of them revert back to the default (under the TMG program folder). |
cgh | is it better to say in a memo under the child that the mother is unknown? this way you don't get all the "unknown" in the pick list. |
darrellm | CheriM: I would certainly record the direct statement that the father was unknown, but even *that* doesn't require an entry in the father field. |
Pegasus891 | I assign the unknowns a number so if I locate the information I can enter it for the proper unknown. |
CheriM | Stans: I don't mind all my "Unknowns." If I find out who it is, I go to the spouse and then I see the Unknown spouse and I fix it from there. That's my fix-it. Guess it's just a difference of user style. |
darrellm | Pegasus891: What benefit is that over leaving the field blank? The question is not meant to be rhetorical. |
henry | Before you go Bob. Is there a way in which the user can remove the period at the end of sentences, e.g. to run sentences from two or more tags together? |
Kevin_Sholder | Darrell, I would agree with that. |
John_C | Henry: there is no way to do that as far as I know (AFAIK) |
Bob_Velke | Not currently, Henry, but it is on the wish list. You can suppress one sentence and write a combined one in the second, however. |
Kevin_Sholder | I'm out of here, have kids that want to play mario gamecube with Dad, since mom is away for the weekend. BYE and THANK YOU. |
CheriM | CGH: That would be another way to work around the Unknonws. |
barbarag | Fran, the project preferences are stored with the project so remain the same on each computer, Program options can be different on each machine |
Bob_Velke | Do you put "unknown" in dates and places, I wonder? |
stans | henry - A presenter at RUG in Arlington, Va., addressed this. Replace [P] at the beginning of a tag with a comma or a semicolon, followed by a space. |
darrellm | stans: Does that suppress the ending period from the previous sentence? |
CheriM | Bob: Personally I put Circa dates, and sometimes I can put "maybe Smith Co" in the places with a note in the memo. |
FranSegall | Thanks, Barb. Although that doesn't seem to be quite what's happening. But I'll take another look. |
Bob_Velke | ok, that's when you know something about the date or place. But if you know nothing about it, do you enter "unknown"? |
stans | Darrell - No, unfortunately; however, my opinion is that it is inevitable that some editing must remain at the word processor level. |
CheriM | Bob: Personally, I just leave it blank until I can find a clue. |
darrellm | stans: I don't accept that for my own output, but if you work that way then it's not difficult to use. |
Bob_Velke | Cheri, that's the point of those who don't enter "unknown" people <g>. |
Bob_Velke | If it isn't entered, then it is unknown without having to say so. |
darrellm | CheriM: I'm still wondering what actual benefit you get from entering the unknowns. I'm not saying there isn't one.... |
CheriM | Bob: Well, it's like a crooked picture in the house. It drives me crazy. I can't stand to see the name at the top, the father's name and no mother's name. So I put Unknown. LOL |
darrellm | CheriM: Breathing exercises might help! <g> |
Bob_Velke | OK, Cheri. If "Unknown" there comforts you, then knock yourself out <g>. |
CheriM | Yep :) |
CheriM | LOL |
cgh | you guys are bad! |
cgh | LOL |
barbarag | <g> not us |
Bob_Velke | We're just trying to see if we were missing something, Cheri. Thanks for taking it in good humor. |
bnx | Not you Barb, your good |
Bob_Velke | ok, folks, sorry but I have to go. Thanks for coming. |
John_C | cu |
barbarag | Talk to you latter tonight |
darrellm | salutations! |
bnx | When is the next one? |
Bob_Velke | Feel free to hang around. There are many experts here. |
CheriM | Bob: No, there really is no point in it. Just preference, I suppose. Like that stupid "I" in that army unit that drives me crazy and looks like lower case l. |
Bob_Velke | dunno, bnx. Watch the newsletter. |
Bob_Velke | Is anyone here from the East side of the big pond? |
Bob_Velke | Wondering if the 2pm timeslot helps. |
CheriM | Isn't the next one at 11pm ET tonight? |
Bob_Velke | well, yes <g> |
bnx | 2pm is good |
CheriM | I'm Pacific time. |
barbarag | I think at one time there were 28 lurking about today. |
cgh | i'm eastern - where is the big pond? |
henry | This time is good for me in UK |
Francie | This time is great for us that go to bed early! |
Bob_Velke | the Atlantic. |
Pegasus891 | I agree with Cheri. For me there is a difference between blanks where I have not yet done research and blanks where I have tried to find information but it remains unknown. |
Bob_Velke | ah, good Henry. Good to see you here. |
CheriM | Pegasus: I think it's just researcher style. That's what makes TMG so good. You can pretty much adapt it to the way you one. |
barbarag | Bob, enjoy the afternoon. |
CheriM | you want, I mean. |
Bob_Velke | Thanks, everyone for coming. Bye... |
Bob_Velke | <poof> |
CheriM | Bye Bob |
Pegasus891 | No, I don't put unknown in dates and places. |
CheriM | Thank you all. I'll try the marriage thing and then try to come back tonight. Bye |
darrellm | CheriM & Pegasus891: How do you avoid all the unknowns popping up in reports, or on charts? |
darrellm | Boy, it's "turn out the lights, the party's over". |
Pegasus891 | I'm still here |
FranSegall | Thanks, y'all! The laundry is calling my name.... |
Pegasus891 | I read slowly. I use unknown judiciously. I don't have tons. |
cgh | so am i - it's my first time and have enjoyed it however the preposition thingy got a little sticky |
darrellm | Pegasus891: OK, understood. |
Pegasus891 | I have only done a little with narratives. I haven't printed anything since I got my new version |
barbarag | cgh we always have a good time here. many opinions! |
darrellm | cgh: The preposition thing is going to do that. Just remember you can carry on a parallel conversation. You don't have to "wait your turn". |
Pegasus891 | I learned a lot in a local users group. I have to get back to it. |
barbarag | I think at one time today, 3 or 4 different conversations were going on |
cgh | don't laugh too loud - do you all type in the name of the person you are replying to or is there a simpler way? |
Pegasus891 | It is sponsored by our state genealogical society. |
Francie | At least - maybe 5! |
darrellm | John_C: Is there anything important about prepositions we missed? |
AllenM | <g> Darrell, we could always talk about before and after if we want sticky. |
John_C | Darrell: Yes--it should be simple; simplifying the design--at the possible cost of a few extra keystrokes here and there--is far better than handling every condition |
barbarag | cgh, we try to add the name. That way we can sort of follow a conversation |
darrellm | cgh: I type it in. If there's an easier way, I'm all ears ... errrr, screen. |
Pegasus891 | I learned about the project explorer. I went and looked it up. I didn't know it was there. |
cgh | darrellm: okay thanks |
darrellm | AllenM: HOOT! Sticky is one thing, argumentative would be another!!! |
Pegasus891 | Can anyone tell me how to surpress a note when I am printing out narratives? |
darrellm | John_C: Which is why I've tried to think of things that aren't "all or nothing" as I mentioned. |
darrellm | Pegasus891: What kind of note? A Tag memo? |
Pegasus891 | yes |
darrellm | Pegasus891: Tag memos print in one of two cases. If "append memo" is in the report definition; or if the Tag sentence calls for it. |
TerryR | Hi, just got back and see there was talk about multiple styles for the same place. |
barbarag | Pegasus891, do you always want it surpressed or just sometimes |
Pegasus891 | I always want to surpress this particular note for this person. |
darrellm | Pegasus891: If you want to append the memo for the report overall, but not for some sentences, add <[M0]> ("em-zero") to the sentence. |
darrellm | Pegasus891: For specific text, you can use curly braces (shift-[ and shift-]). Or, if you want to supress an entire sentence, begin it with - or -- exclusion markers. More? |
darrellm | TerryR: A lot of discussion about prepositions, but the styles question per se got lost in the shuffle. |
barbarag | There's several ways -- See Exclude Information in the Help Files |
darrellm | <;-)> barbarag: That would be "more". |
barbarag | darrellm - so pick up the style question again tonignt. |
darrellm | barbarag: I'll be here. |
barbarag | darrellm - me too. |
TerryR | Thanks, Darrell, I've been pushing for allowing multiple styles per place as a way to get long then short place names in reports. |
barbarag | It's time for me to leave, 'see' some of you later |
TerryR | Looks like the discussion here on multiple styles was to address the preposition issue. |
John_C | Terry: Why not suggest adding a "Short place output template"? |
darrellm | TerryR: True, but I don't think prepositions would be the only - not even the most important - reason for a change to styles handling. |
TerryR | John: Like in SS? |
TerryR | That's one way to do it, but seems to me less flexible. |
John_C | Terry: Well... SS doesn't have a short place template. It uses the TMG project's default. I am suiggesting a short place template that varies by place style. |
darrellm | <g> John_C: Better, a "short place" sentence variable. Even better, emulate Second Site. |
Pegasus891 | thanks |
John_C | TMG would need logic to use the short place template based on the contents of previous tags in the narratrive |
TerryR | I'm not clear on how to make a single template that works with various elements being present. |
darrellm | Pegasus891: Does what you found answer your question? |
TerryR | But SS has a long then short feature - the short uses TMG's short place? |
John_C | Terry: Then specify a short place for the place |
John_C | TerryR: Yes |
darrellm | TerryR: It's gloriously effective. |
TerryR | But you can't do that at the tag level, can you? |
Pegasus891 | Darrellm: Yes, thank you. |
John_C | No, you can't do that at the tag level, but the place data doesn't change at the tag level |
TerryR | But the desired output does. |
TerryR | At least I think it does. |
John_C | SS watches for the same place record used multiple times in a narrative. If the user has selected short, then full, SS substitutes the short place for the 2nd thru Nth places |
darrellm | John_C: TMG would have to determine an equivalent to Second Site's "person entry"; a clear line at which the place replacement starts over. |
John_C | Darrell: I think TMG has that concept now, though I admit I haven't reviewed every report |
darrellm | John_C: I have to admit I haven't put much effort into the minutiae of paper reports from TMG 6. |
John_C | DarrellM: neither have I... <g> |
TerryR | I'd think the long then short method would be a good addition to TMG. |
TerryR | With a report like a Journal, though, does it start over with each person, or one time thru for the whole report? |
John_C | TerryR: I'd suggest restarting at each person. For spouse and children events within a person entry, they would be subject to the rule |
TerryR | Sounds reasonable. |
AllenM | I agree with John about starting with each person. |
darrellm | -- lurkers -- Any questions? |
TerryR | Each "person" entry is a unit, with the spouse and children listed below being the same unit. |
John_C | Thanks Allen--that's what I meant |
TerryR | It's less work to set up than using styles, and adjusts for changes in output with different reports. |
John_C | Terry: Exactly. You don't want to have to modify tag B because you just added tag A |
TerryR | But slightly less flexible within a given person's narrative. |
John_C | But... I think *one* short template for the entire project might not be enough. THat's why I suggest a short place template for each place style. Perhaps it's not necessary |
AllenM | Terry, |
AllenM | there comes a point when you have to edit in a word processor. Pace, Darrell |
TerryR | Never! <g> |
AllenM | What, never? |
John_C | AllenM: Those of us who generate SS sites every couple days don't want to post-process, though Darrell does ! <g> |
TerryR | Yes, but I really don't believe in doing that - I find I keep outputting different reports with different combinations of people, so want the edits to "stick." |
darrellm | Pace tecum, Allen, but so far for me, not true. |
John_C | I've got to go, and I am going to grab the transcript now. Any objections? |
TerryR | Bye. |
TerryR | John |
AllenM | Bye |
darrellm | John_C: And every new feature, I pare down the post-processing more. I may even get it all in one batch file! |
darrellm | John_C: By the way, I don't use post-processing to handle *content*. I do all that in TMG using the assumption the output will be left alone. |
TerryR | Wonder if you could develop a short place template that includes conditionals? |
darrellm | Laundry is calling me too. Later tonight! |
TerryR | Say if the city exists, omit the county, but if not, include it? |
darrellm | TerryR: I was about to say you can do that now, but not I think with "nested" or "not" conditionals.... |
darrellm | Bye all!!! |
TerryR | I'm thinking that one short place template can't work when some places include cities, and others don't, for example. |
John_C | Terry: In the current SS, I use the same rules for the short place template as for the output template in the style. |
John_C | I also think that the short place logic has to handle some special cases: if the short place template yields a blank place, but the actual place isn't blank, show the full place, for example |
TerryR | I'm not sure what that means in this case?? |
John_C | Place templates have limited conditional rules and SS uses them for the short place template |
TerryR | I don't think that solves my problem. When I have a place with a city, county, state, I might want city only for short. |
John_C | That's more complicated... if city <> blank then show city, else ... |
TerryR | But if it's county, state, I want county for short. I don't think I can do both with exiting rules. |
TerryR | Your idea of a short template per style would work, but require me to set the style depending on the contents. |
TerryR | Have we beat this to death? |
AllenM | But isn't that what styles are all about anyway? |
TerryR | I suppose, but have never found a need for them so far. |
TerryR | I find the standard style works find for the full place. |
TerryR | So having to set them to get the short place to work seems unnecessarly complex if it could be set up with a clever enough short template |
AllenM | Wait a minute! Isn't the short place enough? In the MPL, County, State is a different place from City, County, State. |
TerryR | The short place field in the MPL would work, but they're awful to use in my view. I'm looking for the short place template to be able to do it automatically. |
TerryR | I'd rather set place styles for every tag than have to enter something in the short place field for many places. |
TerryR | Now if you could access the short place field from a tag rather than having to go to the MPL, that might be different. |
AllenM | I see what you mean, but I have a lot fewer places than tags. |